This article clearly presents how to create a good society and the obstacles which prevent it.
Philosophy is intended to help us achieve a promising future, or at least a more desirable one. Philosophers have tried to provide us with the solution. Some of them gave us good advice on how to improve our lives, but no philosopher has ever defined how to create a good society, so it remains unestablished.
Why is that? Authorities have always had power and control over society. Philosophers have recognized reality and accepted it as such. Trying to find a better solution for society sometimes has been a dangerous idea because authorities used to kill those people who wanted to change anything. With respect to authorities, philosophers have created an opportune vision of nature, society, and their phenomena. Such a view was largely subjective, meaning it was detached from objective reality. Throughout human history, a considerable amount of knowledge has been accumulated and disseminated to people. Alienated knowledge is false, so it separates people from the truth and, thus, from a good life. Studying philosophy today means studying the historical mistakes of human thought.
However, the study of philosophy and sciences has brought more objectivity to society, which has reduced alienation. It also brought democracy, which took power away from absolute authorities and provided a better life for the people. By learning from mistakes, we understand today that privileged authorities have been a primary problem in the history of humankind, because privileges are evil.
So, does it mean that democracy has taken power from authorities, and now we have the best lives possible? No! The influential people have never abandoned an idea to rule the world. They accepted democracy mostly because they learned that many of those who tried to rule the world lost their lives. Instead, the influential people have cleverly decided to control the world secretly, using the wealth they have built over centuries. This is the origin of the conspiracy we live in today.
The rich own all influential media in the Western world and only release information that benefits them. The so-called independent media, which often rely on donations to survive, cannot be truly independent of the big donors who support them. The rich pay people to promote their interests, even by engaging in conversations on social media. One may then wonder how many truly independent media outlets truly exist. Politicians can hardly gain power without support from the wealthy, so they will be beholden to them. Similarly, the wealthy managed to control organizations and sciences. By corrupting influential people, the rich impose their will everywhere. The people have choices only if they are acceptable to the rich. Today, the rich have more power than the most extraordinary emperors in human history, yet they conceal their influence, so people are unaware of it.
The support of Karl Marx by the wealthy is an excellent example of a highly successful conspiracy that has hindered societal development for over a century, and it remains largely hidden from the public. Marx called for a socialist revolution to replace capitalism, so why would the rich support him? Because the conspirators intended Marxism for uncooperative countries only. Vladimir Ilyich Lenin was supported by the rich, and Rosa Luxemburg was killed. Therefore, the socialist revolution in Russia was successful, whereas it never occurred in Germany. The wealthy are often masters of deception and crime.
Furthermore, Marxism has been supported by the rich because they knew that Marx’s socialism could not replace capitalism. Additionally, Marxists hinder the development of capitalism by refusing to support non-Marxist left-wing ideas, which might replace it. Paradoxically, the rich deceive Marxists into helping them. This deception is presented in my article: Marx still prevents the progress of society.
The conspiracy has developed enormously. The rich control the Western world and want to conquer the rest of it. Only the rich people could have profited from the aggression against Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Ukraine, and Venezuela. If the rich had attacked these countries openly, then they would be called criminal aggressors. Through the conspiracy, nobody can connect the rich people with the responsibility for the crimes they commit. We are witnessing the greatest deception ever devised, which conceals the evils of the rich and amplifies their power.
***
On my journey to seek truth, I have analyzed the world and noticed that we have lived in authoritarian systems for a long time. By using an inductive method, I have noticed that the more autocratic the society was, the worse the people lived, and the more equal rights people had, the better the society was. Throughout history, we have indeed strived towards equal human rights and made improvements in society.
Authorities today attempt to convince us that we have already established equal human rights, but that is not the case. If the president of a country may send people to war, and they cannot do it to them, the rights are not equal. If employers may fire workers, and they cannot do it to them, the rights are not equal. If teachers may impose knowledge on students, and they cannot do it to them, the rights are not equal.
To define equal human rights, I had to exclude all knowledge that authorities have imposed throughout history. That means I had to determine the nature of individuals and society from the beginning. And I did it. I began with the premise that equal human rights must provide equal opportunities to everyone. Whatever one can do must be allowed to everybody else. Then I defined what equal human rights must be. Considering that the truth has always been forbidden, they appear unusual to most people.
By implementing equal human rights, people will gain significantly more political power than the wealthy. I have called this power democratic anarchy. Each person shall have equal rights to evaluate others. A positive evaluation will result in a small award for the assessed person, and a negative evaluation will result in a minor punishment. After its implementation, everyone will strive to provide the highest possible convenience for others and minimize any inconvenience they may cause. This measure alone will create a good society. Governments, media, and everyone would have to follow the interests of the people, not those of the rich, or they will be strongly punished.
Equal human rights will take power away from the wealthy. Even if the rich become the owners of the entire global economy, people will still have a predominant influence on income distribution. They will achieve it directly by determining the length of daily work hours. The shorter the work hours are, the greater the demand for workers will be, and the higher the pay per hour will be for employers. Life will reveal to people which work hours will bring them the highest salaries. I wrote more about it in the article: Let’s remove unemployment.
These straightforward measures will make capitalism a decent social system very soon after implementation. Then comes the final stage of equal human rights, where each person will have the same right to work at every public workplace at any time. The best productivity offer for any public job will get the right to work. This economy gives more market opportunities than capitalism can afford. The labour market will determine work productivity, responsibilities, and values. This is a complex task. To explain it, I had to write the book Humanism.
The book defines a new social system in which presidents and people, bosses and workers, teachers and students, will all have equal rights. Only this should be called socialism. No economy could be better than one where the best workers secure every public job, thereby sending capitalism down in history. Socialism will also bring balance to society and harmony among the people.
My work is confirmed even in the animal world. The stronger animal often eats a weaker one, while equal-power animals respect and do not attack each other. They live in relative harmony. The same or better will happen to people.
I found that equal human rights are the only escape from social evil and the only condition necessary for creating a good society. We have never had equal rights among people, and this is the only reason society has never been good. Once equal human rights are established, the society will become good unconditionally.
***
The history of humankind has been shaped by authoritarian thought. I skipped the mistakes of previous philosophers through the process of disalienation. People who visit my websites www.sarovic.net and www.sarovic.org may easily see that I propose a significant improvement to humankind. Since we live in a horrible society, my ideas should be examined, but new ideas cannot influence society if they are not supported by the rich, who control everything. They have prevented my work. I have worked hard to bypass them, trying to convince people that my philosophy is right, but I was not successful in doing so.
When I approach Christians, presenting them my philosophy, including controversies in the Bible and the truth that comes from my work, they do not like it. The same result emerges when I confront my philosophy with Marxism, capitalism, democracy, anarchy, science, or other ideologies. Most of the followers of these ideologies avoid discussions with me because they are upset by the truth. It tells them their knowledge is not accurate enough. They prefer their beliefs over the truth. Some people tried to confront me in discussions, but they had to retreat from my arguments. I challenge readers to find any flaws in the articles linked above. So far, nobody has been able to do it. This tells me I’m right and gives me the strength to continue my work.
The rich did not try to kill me because they do not consider me a threat. They believe their conspiracy will prevent my work. And they were right so far. But anyway, in the case I become successful in fighting the conspiracy and in changing the world, I think that I have protected myself from being killed by accusing Jacob Rothschild of doing it. I rely my life on that.
People raised under the control of authorities generally do not believe in equal human rights, or even worse, they do not like it. They love having power over people, which is the opposite of a good life. A good life is a result of natural needs coming from cooperation among equal people. By refusing equality, people prevent themselves from achieving their promising future.
Many people love my work, but the social system I have proposed is so different from all models imposed by authorities that people cannot see if the result would be as positive as I claim it to be. The conspiracy has permanently distracted people from the truth, making it difficult for them to accept my philosophy. Additionally, many people are apprehensive about their future in a capitalist society and do not want to exacerbate their fears by confronting the root cause of their fears. All of these make it very hard for me to engage people more deeply in my work.
I am alone, without access to mainstream media, promoting a new philosophy that aims to make this world a more beautiful place to live, in opposition to established ideologies worldwide, which, although ineffective, are well-supported by authorities and the media. The acceptance of my philosophy and building a bright future for humankind will require time. Time for truth.