There are two general ways in which authorities hold power in democratic countries. The first way is to take state power through elections, but if they do not follow the will of the people, the authorities are replaced at subsequent polls. The second way brings permanent power to authorities because it is based on conspiracy. A conspiracy is a secret plan devised by a group of people to achieve self-benefit at the expense of others. The secrecy of the conspiracy prevents other people from knowing it exists. It is challenging to debunk, as it is often difficult to identify the individuals who created and profited from it, making it almost impossible for people to escape the influence of conspiracies.
Who are conspirators? Today, the conspirators are often wealthy individuals who control political parties through significant donations. If a politician tries not to listen, then the media owned by the rich proclaim him incapable of the job or even a traitor to the country, and his career is finished. By controlling political parties, the rich can create laws that benefit them the most, thereby also creating a social policy that suits them best. That makes everything related to conspiracies lawful, but often unjust to people. We are now witnessing a massive conspiracy of wealthy people who have subordinated the poor. The conspiracy captures each moment of people’s everyday lives.
By controlling societal policies, conspirators also influence science. They support the sciences that they benefit from and do not let those that might harm them be recognized. Sciences have always depended on wealthy donors’ money. The conspiracy of science creates false or useless knowledge, which is a primary origin of the alienation and injustices around the world. I will present here one conspiracy in economic science, which sharply increases the profits of the rich and the exploitation of the poor. It is a conspiracy about unemployment.
Economic science has taught that unemployment of 5% is a normal thing, which is not. Unemployed people often have to accept lower wages while competing against each other to provide for their families. That is not just. Why would we not eliminate unemployment by reducing work hours and then let employers compete for each other to get workers? That would increase workers’ salaries and bring justice to people. Workers would be able to purchase more, which would stimulate the economy. Everyone would benefit from it.
Thanks to this conspiracy, no student of economics has ever heard about the benefits of eliminating unemployment. No professor has ever challenged unemployment in this way because nobody confronts the basic principles that they accepted during their university studies. I did question it and presented the benefits of full employment in numerous online discussion forums, where I successfully defended it against all criticism. I have also managed to speak with economics professors, and they were unable to offer a response beyond stating that full employment is impossible to achieve. Mark Twain said, “It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” Therefore, it is challenging to change people’s opinions unless they hear it from multiple sources, which is often only accessible to the wealthy.
I wrote numerous articles about eliminating unemployment, aiming to bring benefits to people, but I was unable to do so. The media was not willing to publish them. You probably understand that most of the media are owned by the wealthy, and they do not want to pay workers more, so they do not want to teach workers how to negotiate for higher wages. How about hundreds of so-called independent left-wing journals and magazines which allegedly fight for the benefits of people? Over the last eighteen years, I have submitted thousands of articles to them, and only a few have been published. Global Research published my article Let's Remove Unemployment, for example. I have observed that the left-leaning media does not promote new ideas that could improve humanity. That suggests the editors were not only influenced by false knowledge but also corrupted by the wealthy. Thanks to a conspiracy, the truth is not available to the people, and that is a problem.
The conspirators strongly support ideas that have no chance of benefiting people. They have supported Marxism, for example, which was supposed to bring good results to people, but conspirators knew it could not. Conspirators also supported Lenin to harm Russia by instigating a revolution there. Now I will discuss the prohibited aspect of the conspiracy, as there is no hard evidence to confirm these facts. But, would it not be in the interest of wealthy conspirators to support Marxism, which was not able to perform better than capitalism? Also, Marxism has supported violent revolutions. Should it not be outlawed because of it? On the contrary, it has been freely taught at Western universities. Why? Marxism brings benefits to capitalism by putting the left on the wrong track, which guarantees that nothing can replace capitalism. Conspirators are very smart.
So what do you think? Is it easier to raise a revolution or to shorten work hours proportionally to the unemployment rate? I am confident that shorter work hours would bring considerable benefits to all people, which revolution cannot. People are unaware of this due to a conspiracy. This conspiracy prevents people from finding the bright future of humankind. However, the entire conspiracy is far more extensive than that. I think the main conspirator today is Jacob Rothschild. I wrote about him and his conspiracy in the article: Jacob Rothschild is Guilty for the Conspiracy against Humankind.