The Conspiracy of the World Exposed

There is a basis for an investigation against the doctors who have been caring for Slobodan Milošević's heart disease in the court in The Hague. Three months before his death, a medical check-up found traces of the medicine Rifampicin in his blood. It is a drug for leprosy and tuberculosis, which is known as a neutralizer of some effects of the medication Milošević received for his high blood pressure and heart condition. Milošević was informed about it four days before his death when he stopped taking the medicine.

Finding the unnecessary medicine in Milošević's blood that reduces the drug's effect on his heart condition could be characterized as an attempt to murder. The investigation into why the medicine for leprosy and tuberculosis was traced in his blood was never performed. The court released notes indicating that Slobodan Milošević had unrestricted access to medicine, allowing him to administer it himself. In other words, he may have done it on purpose to kill himself. The investigation of Slobodan Milošević's death did not consider that he cried out to receive help from an independent doctor. The court rejected his request, and it resulted in the infarct from which he died. There is no surprise that the investigators concluded that Milošević died of a heart attack as a natural cause.

However, many doctors stated that the routine operation of coronary angiography and stenting would have certainly prevented his death. This is an elementary medical procedure for heart disease, which would save his life. His doctors have to answer why such a routine intervention of inserting a stent in his heart artery was not performed. The former Prime Minister of Serbia, Ivica Dačić, said that "Milošević did not die in The Hague; he was killed in The Hague." One may assume beyond a reasonable doubt that the death of Slobodan Milošević was a crime committed by the International Court of Justice in The Hague. The investigation must be reopened. It would most likely lead to the conspirators who are responsible for his death. For more information, please visit: Death of Slobodan Milošević.

President Bush  

On September 11, 2001, the terrorist suicide attack by commercial planes destroyed the World Trade Center in New York and heavily damaged the Pentagon in Washington, DC. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) performed an investigation into the 9/11 attacks and found that the impact of planes, fire, and the heavy load of the buildings destroyed the WTC and the Pentagon. Some American media have heavily doubted this, citing numerous reasons why it would not be possible. A large number of people claimed that the buildings were demolished with explosives. Some of them formed conspiracy theories claiming that the Bush administration attacked the WTC and Pentagon to obtain a pretext for the aggression on Iraq and Afghanistan, and profit from it.

This nonsense inspired me to conduct my investigation of 9/11. I found the NIST report correct and that the US government had nothing to do with 9/11. President Bush did not have the operational ability to derive a significant personal benefit from the aggression in Iraq and Afghanistan. He was surprised by the 9/11 attack and reacted awkwardly when he heard about it. The terrorists are all dead, so the chance to confirm a possible conspiracy about 9/11 is very weak.  

But the conspirators made a big mistake, which convinced me that the conspiracy did exist. In the last 18 years, the conspirators most likely invested billions of dollars in the 9/11 false propaganda to accuse the US government of it. Nobody spends such an amount of money in vain, and without such an investment, nobody would blame the US government for 9/11. The investigation needs to determine who invested the money and why they would accuse the government. It will most likely lead to the conspirators.  

Who are the conspirators, and why would they do it? They are influential, wealthy individuals who significantly influence or control the US government. They most likely organized the 9/11 attacks to get people's support for aggression against independent countries, which had nothing to do with 9/11. They earned trillions of dollars from waging wars in these countries. It was just a business, and usually, companies spend 10% on marketing, which means the conspirators might have spent hundreds of billions of dollars on the propaganda they needed. They planned to earn much more by colonizing these countries. Furthermore, their manipulation has reduced freedom in the Western world, dividing people and leaving them unable to understand the source of the problem. The elite are masters of deception.  

So, how was the conspiracy executed? One agent of the elite has probably found Muslim fanatics ready to carry out 9/11. Then they searched for a scapegoat to hide their own responsibility and deceive the people. They could not find anyone else but the US government itself. The conspirators use the US government as a fake culprit for their crimes very often. When you hear the CIA did this or that, the only way you can listen to it is when the wealthy conspirators who control the media let you hear it. However, this time, if the investigation against the government ever opens, it would conclude that the government is innocent, and that would mean no conspiracy ever existed. The conspirators would walk free of their crimes as they had done before.

My experience with Western media has taught me that it is almost impossible to publish an inconvenient truth for authorities in the Western world. If the accusations against the government were true, nobody would publish them. A massive number of fake videos about 9/11 cannot be produced and distributed by chance. They must be the result of the conspiracy. The investigation should ask the people who created the fake videos where they got the money. Sooner or later, it would lead to the conspirators.

Even though President Bush was innocent in the 9/11 attack, he is still responsible for "the war against terrorism," which was a synonym for conquering non-obedient countries in the Middle East. It was a crime. He needs to answer who pushed him to commit aggression in Iraq and Afghanistan. This should also lead to the conspirators. It would give the names of the people who, together with President Bush, are responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent people.  

President Obama

The conspirators wanted to remove Muammar Gaddafi from power in Libya to be able to take control over the Libyan state, oil, and people. They pressured President Obama to do it. I do not know whether President Obama organized the rebellion in Libya, but he must have put the NATO air force in the service of the rebels because nobody else could do it. The Libyan rebels were victorious because they got laser devices from NATO to guide NATO bombs onto the Libyan army. Whenever the rebels and the Libyan army clashed, NATO's laser-guided bombs destroyed the Libyan army. Otherwise, Libyan rebels in pickup trucks would not have been able to defeat the Libyan army, armed with tanks, especially in such a short period. It was a crime. President Obama needs to reveal who pressured him to attack Libya, and this will lead to the conspirators.  

President Trump

No president of the US has ever been a more evident supporter of corporations than President Trump. Among other things, he relieved the corporations by lowering their taxes and privileged them by reducing free trade. He waged a trade war with China, economically sanctioned Russia, blindly supported Israel and pressured Venezuela and Iran politically and financially. President Trump can hardly support the rich more, and the rich can hardly find a better president for themselves. And yet, the corporate media owned by the rich have been attacking President Trump from the beginning of his mandate. I know Trump has a weird character and lies a lot. But why would the rich attack their asset in the US?

Another question is why President Trump's rating increases with a policy that people traditionally despise. His policy should have received a low rating. But with a low rating, Trump would not be able to support the rich. I think this is the reason the rich have created a conspiracy, which increased Trump's rating by misleading the American people completely. I have imagined a conspiracy theory that presents how it could be done. It is a brilliant deception of the American people.

The rich invented the Russian meddling in the US election and falsely accused Trump of cooperating with the Russians. Then the rich assigned a special prosecutor, Robert Mueller, to investigate the Russian "interference" in the 2016 United States elections and "suspicious" links between Trump associates and Russian officials. The investigation lasted two years, and the opposition welcomed it, hoping Trump, with his awful policy, would be impeached. During this time, the rich have encouraged the opposition to attack President Trump, claiming that proof of Russian support for Trump in the election will emerge in just a matter of time. The media, controlled by the rich, hysterically covered every event, which raised suspicion about Trump's cooperation with Russia. This fooled the people.  

Finally, after two years of investigation, the Mueller report stated that they did not find proof that President Trump's campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russians; nor did they find that Trump obstructed justice. Of course, they could not possibly find proof for it because the rich people invented it. The Mueller report has made President Trump innocent after two years of accusations. It has increased Trump's approval rating, allowing him to continue implementing his unpopular policies. The opposition's approval rating dropped because it lost credibility after two years of supporting President Trump's false accusations.

By encouraging the media to launch unintelligent emotional attacks on Trump, the elite have intensified conflicts between his supporters and opponents. The elite profit from confrontation, as those who are confronted can hardly find a beneficial solution. They argue over trivial matters that cannot change anything. This example illustrates how creative and persistent the conspirators might be in shaping public policy. It does not necessarily mean the rich will win the next election with President Trump. They support all candidates, so they cannot lose.  

The conspirators are the masters of deception. Whatever people think is false, so they can avoid their unfavourable positions.    

***  

The wealthy have established a system that enables them to prevail under any president. It does not matter who the American president is; they must follow the interests of the rich. Otherwise, their presidency would be jeopardized; they might be removed or even killed. Jimmy Carter was impeached, Richard Nixon was removed,  and John Kennedy was assassinated. In my opinion, it happened because they resisted the will of the rich.

During their mandates, American presidents have killed thousands or more people in wars. Is there something in their job description that forces them to kill people? No; the conspirators force them to follow their interests. The American political system has given the U.S. presidents too much power over the people, and this power is secretly controlled by the rich. It happens because the presidents alternate, and the wealthy remain in permanent control and rule behind the scenes. The presidents are puppets of the rich. 

All US presidents have spent people's money in favour of the rich. President Bush, pressured by the conspirators, spent around a trillion dollars on wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. He has left each American citizen $3,000 in debt because of it. The US president and Congress may put the American people in debt against their will, and they cannot respond. This is because the wealthy have established a democracy that benefits them, not the people. This is also a result of the conspiracy. 

On October 3, 2008, President Bush signed the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), which gave $700 billion to troubled financial institutions to avoid bankruptcy by purchasing their toxic assets and equity. In the article, The Big Bank Bailout, published in Forbes on July 14, 2015, Mike Collins wrote: "Most people think that the big bank bailout was the $700 billion that the Treasury Department used to save the banks during the financial crash in September of 2008. However, this is far from the truth, as the bailout is still ongoing. The Special Inspector General for TARP summary says the government's total commitment is $ 16.8 trillion, with $4.6 trillion already paid out. Yes, it was trillions, not billions, and the banks are now larger and still too big to fail. But the bailout story isn't just about the government money. This is a story about lies, cheating, and a multi-faceted corruption which was often criminal." The US government still bails out banks that are too big to fail at the expense of US taxpayers.

The US government issues more money than it can return, and this causes inflation. Whenever the US government issues a trillion dollars through the Federal Reserve, anyone who possesses one dollar worldwide loses a few cents of its value due to inflation. People can buy less with that dollar, while the US government takes what consumers lost. This is a taxation of the whole world. This is also one reason the US is the most powerful country in the world. This is also the reason the elite who rule the US are the most powerful people in the world. 

The Western world's conspirators have hijacked the rights that should belong to the people and called it Western democracy. No doubt, they want to control the whole world in the same manner. They work hard to subdue countries around the world, and the results are evident. Russia and China have begun actively resisting the rich's conspiracy, which has made the conspirators anxious and has caused them to increase trouble in the world. Our well-being and peace on Earth depend on the will of dictators who cannot be accused of their crimes because their rule is invisible. We must stop it.  

Jacob Rothschild is the most prominent name mentioned in the conspiracy theory world.

***  

All the knowledge society has built has not created a good society, so I have developed a new form of democracy that will change the world and make it a wonderful place to live. It is based on my philosophy of equal human rights, which, in my opinion, is the only proper orientation for society. The new form of democracy will eliminate all evil emanating from corrupt authorities and conspirators, whether or not the courts prosecute them. It will create a bright future for humankind unconditionally. The idea is entirely new, so it may seem unacceptable at first glance, but it will change once people consider it, as it offers a win-win solution. 

The future of democracy will not be based on voting for individuals anymore, but rather on the evaluations of their work. Let each person have equal power to evaluate, say, three individuals positively and three individuals negatively, or any combination, with a total of six evaluations each month. Let each evaluation have the power of one dollar. This means each positive evaluation awards one dollar to the evaluated person, and each negative assessment deducts one dollar. Such power of the assessment will direct each member of society to respect other people. Such assessments will encourage every person to create the best advantages for others, do everything they can to enrich other people's lives and diminish or abolish the creation of all forms of disadvantages. This will eliminate social evil and build a good society.

I call this evaluation democratic anarchy. It will primarily affect authorities. The higher the position authorities hold in society, the more people they affect, and the greater their responsibility, as they will receive more evaluations from the public. If presidents can incur debts on behalf of each citizen for thousands of dollars, why can't citizens have the right to incur debts on behalf of presidents for one dollar? Such a small amount of power in people's hands will force presidents in every country to act responsibly toward their citizens. When people accept democratic anarchy, presidents will have to follow the people's needs.

For example, if US presidents implement bad policies, lie to the people, or commit criminal aggression against other countries, they might receive 100,000,000 negative evaluations from Americans. That would cost them $100 million in just one month. The American presidents would no longer dare to wage wars or spend state money on private interests. If they do not fulfill the people's interests, they will have to abandon their positions quickly. Then, President Trump would not remain in his position for longer than one month. Only the most skillful and brave individuals would dare lead countries. They will no longer be authorities, but sincere servants of the people.

Each and every person must respect the interests of others; otherwise, they will sooner or later face the power of the people. This is what will build a bright future for humankind unconditionally. I wrote more about it in the article  Democratic Anarchy is the Future of Democracy.